A Review of ‘Why Software is Eating The World’: How have the companies fared?
Six and a half years ago in his seminal essay “Why Software Is Eating The World”, Marc Andreessen theorized “…software companies are poised to take over broad swathes of the economy.” This theory has indeed proven out. Andreessen also stated that “Many of the prominent new Internet companies are building real, high-growth, high-margin, highly defensible businesses.” This statement has held not held up as well outside of the famed FAANG.Below, we synopsized how FAANG and 5 other one-time (and a couple still) high fliers have fared since 2011.CAGRs based on growth from 2011 to 2017. Sources: Statista.com, Macrotrends.net A Review of ‘Why Software is Eating The World’
1.2BN Gmail users in 2017, 23% CAGR, 20% of global email market share
Generating more than $10BN in annual profit
Significant net profit contraction, (12.6%) CAGR as the ads business competition has heated up and Google has been displaced by FB, also shift to mobile
Search dominance: 87% web share; 53% mobile share, up from 43% 2015
Android is the OS for mobile. Great second act to search/ads.
G Suite in the small business hizzy
Market and tech ready for Waymo to prove its potential
OTHERS MENTIONED
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Checking in was a concept they created.
Years of place and intent datamay eat traditional consumer behavior research.
50% YoY revenue growth 2015-2017
3BN monthly visits, more than double over last year
Not profitable as of 2017
Foursquare has shifted nicely from a B2C “toy” into a 3-headed B2B offering spanning advertising, enterprise data and developer tools (Pilgrim SDK)
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Groupon ate daily deals, then the whole industry got spit out.
10% global revenue CAGR
Global revenue grew from $1.6BN to $2.8BN
Net margin of 0.5% for 2017, so Groupon made $14M on $2.8BN in revenue
Easily replicated. Think we all know what happened with daily deals and flash sales
Scale didn’t help as was race to the bottom without any sort of vendor or user lock-in
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Came to market after iTunes, Pandora. Delighted users with discovery.
Could eat traditional record labels, booking, and ticket sales platforms.
46% global revenue CAGR. 1.7x more revenue than Twitter.
68% paid subscriber CAGR, now at 70M
21% gross margin
Ability to control and expand margins not proven. No natural economies of scale.
Apple, Amazon, Google all want this. Question is: how badly?
How far ahead is Spotify algorithmically for its users and musicians?
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
First to do real-time, many to many communication, but that didn’t eat anything.
69% global revenue CAGR
Global revenue grew from $106M to $2.4BN
Stalled MAU growth over last 3 years
Net loss of $110M in 2017
Has not proven out. Widely noted that Twitter is looking for its next act and has been for a few years now.
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Ate platform-driven gaming. Got served by mobile. Now, back in the fray. That said, Nintendo and PlayStation are still very much a thing, so there’s no Blockbuster story here.
(5%) global revenue CAGR
Global revenue has dropped below $1BN
14% EBITDA margin in Q2 2017, halfway to 30% margin target
The dangers of being reliant on one platform (Facebook) almost killed Zynga.
They’ve shifted to mobile, which now accounts for ~90% of sales, and is growing 30% YoY. How defensible their offerings are long-term is still undetermined.
ConclusionsFAANG have sharpened themselves into market dominating growth machines with highly diversified offerings and business models across multiple billion dollar opportunities. They are ever-evolving while continuing to improve their core businesses. In 2017, FAANG stock gains ranged from 33% (Google) to 56% (Amazon), compared to a 28% gain for the Nasdaq at large. FAANG-themed ETFs popped up in earnest 9 months ago. ETFDB.com now lists 35 ETFs describing themselves as such.The other companies Andreessen referenced have been a mixed bag, with Foursquare and Spotify being the exceptions. When written, many of the companies mentioned were still heavily B2C and early in their B2B business model and platform diversification lifecycles. The core commonality is their shared struggle to find and seize upon their “Second Act”.
Other Commentary
By Brian Parks
April 7, 2018
A Review of ‘Why Software is Eating The World’: How have the companies fared?
Six and a half years ago in his seminal essay “Why Software Is Eating The World”, Marc Andreessen theorized “…software companies are poised to take over broad swathes of the economy.” This theory has indeed proven out. Andreessen also stated that “Many of the prominent new Internet companies are building real, high-growth, high-margin, highly defensible businesses.” This statement has held not held up as well outside of the famed FAANG.Below, we synopsized how FAANG and 5 other one-time (and a couple still) high fliers have fared since 2011.CAGRs based on growth from 2011 to 2017. Sources: Statista.com, Macrotrends.net A Review of ‘Why Software is Eating The World’
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Completed:
In Process:
Predictions:
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Completed:
In Process:
Predictions:
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Completed:
In Process:
Predictions:
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Completed:
In Process:
Predictions:
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Completed:
–Preceding search engines
-Traditional advertiser platforms
In Process:
– Apple’s smartphone dominance via Android
Predictions:
OTHERS MENTIONED
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
Industries Eaten
High Growth
High Margin
Defensibility
ConclusionsFAANG have sharpened themselves into market dominating growth machines with highly diversified offerings and business models across multiple billion dollar opportunities. They are ever-evolving while continuing to improve their core businesses. In 2017, FAANG stock gains ranged from 33% (Google) to 56% (Amazon), compared to a 28% gain for the Nasdaq at large. FAANG-themed ETFs popped up in earnest 9 months ago. ETFDB.com now lists 35 ETFs describing themselves as such.The other companies Andreessen referenced have been a mixed bag, with Foursquare and Spotify being the exceptions. When written, many of the companies mentioned were still heavily B2C and early in their B2B business model and platform diversification lifecycles. The core commonality is their shared struggle to find and seize upon their “Second Act”.
Share on:
Recent posts
Capital Provider Market Sentiment Survey
The Importance of Strong Revenue Health
SaaS Distilled Pt. 5: What is ARR?
Zonos: From Bootstrapped in the Basement to Solving…
Bigfoot Capital Announces Summer 2021 Investment Activity
SaaS Distilled Pt. 4: Understanding SaaS Quick Ratio
Programming School
Featured posts